Style Weekly reports Charlie Diradour will run in 2010

September 15th, 2009

This appeared in Style Weekly today.

Charlie Diradour to Challenge Cantor

by Scott Bass

Charlie Diradour, a longtime Democratic political adviser and self-described fiscal conservative, is running for Congress.

A local real estate developer who became one of the leading opponents to the Shockoe Bottom ballpark proposal earlier this year, Diradour hopes to unseat Republican Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Henrico, the minority party’s whip in the lower house.

Diradour is a Fan resident who got his start working as a volunteer on former Attorney Mary Sue Terry’s political campaign in 1985. He advised former City Council President William J. Pantele in his bid for mayor last year.

More recently, Diradour launched a Web site for supporters of keeping minor league baseball at The Diamond on the Boulevard, and became a vocal critic of Highwoods Properties’ plan to build a $363 million, ballpark-anchored development in the Bottom. Highwoods, facing harsh public criticism and questions about the project?s financing, pulled out of the project in July.

Bringing down Cantor, a rising and well-funded GOP star, won?t be so easy. The 7th District, which stretches from the Richmond?s West End to Rappahannock County in the north, and includes portions of Henrico and Chesterfield counties, is considered a Republican stronghold. Cantor is up for reelection in November 2010.

“It’s always good to have competition, but the climb is steep in a solidly Republican district,” says Daniel J. Palazzolo, professor of political science at the University of Richmond. “I don’t see the kinds of conditions that would make a Republican in the 7th District vulnerable.”

Diradour says he’s up to the challenge. He says he’s already raised “substantial pledges,” and figures he’ll need at least $1 million to mount a credible challenge. A tireless pol with years of campaign experience, Diradour is hitting the campaign trail and has launched a campaign Web site, www.charlieforthe7th.com. He says the reception from regular voters and campaign donors has been encouraging.

Diradour insists that he?s not running a sacrificial campaign. “If I run, I want to see a clear path to victory,” he says, “not just be a token, somebody who gets 35 percent.”

But after an unprecedented presidential election a year ago — after 40 years of Republican dominance in presidential elections, Obama comfortably won Virginia — the pendulum is swinging back to the GOP.

The political environment doesn’t

I dreamt I saw Joe Wilson last night

September 10th, 2009

Cantor has not joined in the call for a reprimand of Congressman Wilson’s (R SC) disrespect to the president.

Joe Wilson: "Liar"

Joe Wilson: "Liar"

Rep. Joe Wilson’s rude interruption of President Obama’s speech to Congress with the words, “You lie,” when the president said his health care plan would not cover illegal immigrants.

Cantor’s Blackberry

September 10th, 2009

Cantor issued this statement last night after the president’s address to the joint session:

Tonight the President failed to say anything different or offer clear specifics, and with that in mind the reason for this over hyped speech is strangely unclear. The President has now delivered over 100 speeches where he?s discussed health care and said the same thing. He’s held prime time press conferences, hosted television specials from the White House, and addressed a joint-session of Congress and only thing he?s made explicitly clear is that the status quo is unacceptable, a fact that we all agree on. While the President continues to blame unnamed special interests and Republicans, the fact is that the Democrats overwhelmingly control both the House and the Senate. The President and his party have failed to lead by offering reform that Americans are comfortable with. Families understand that a costly government-run plan will force them to pay more and get less.

Was he paying attention? How could he know what the president said?

Isn’t this disrespect of the president?

Cantor Warns Against Passing Health Care Reform

September 2nd, 2009

Top Republican Warns Against Forcing Through Health Change

ATLANTA, Georgia (CNN) — A top Republican in Congress warned Monday that using a legislative tactic to pass a Democratic health-care bill opposed by Republicans would increase public anger over partisan politics.

Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, the third-ranking House Republican, told a CNN editorial board meeting that an American public already unnerved by the economic recession wants unified action on major issues such as health care.

Some Democrats are calling for President Barack Obama and Democratic congressional leaders to use a tactic called reconciliation to pass a desired health-care overhaul. While Democrats hold a majority in both chambers of Congress, it is unclear if they control enough seats to overcome opposition from all Republicans and some Democrats.

Under reconciliation, which applies to bills affecting the federal budget and deficit, a measure requires a simple majority of 51 votes to pass in the Senate, rather than the super majority of 60 votes needed to overcome an opposition filibuster.

Cantor said the public anger displayed at some town-hall meetings on health care would worsen if Democrats force through a bill using reconciliation.

“If they use … the reconciliation option, it would necessarily mean that a bill proceeding under those rules is not a bill representing the mainstream of this country,” Cantor said, adding such a move would make it harder for Obama to make further progress. “This president was elected to bring people together, to bring a divided nation back together,” Cantor said. “I don?t think taking that kind of action would really help” reverse the partisanship of recent years.

Cantor complained that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders have rejected Republican ideas or participation on major legislation. “The last eight months have been ‘my way or the highway,’” Cantor said.

It appears that the Cantor tactic is to try to obstruct progress in any way possible, deploy the angry “grassroots,” and then blame the Democrats. What “Republican Ideas” is Cantor referring to?

Cantor as “Great White Hope” of GOP

August 29th, 2009

This article appeared in The Topeka Capital Journal.

Jenkins’ remark raises eyebrows


By Tim Carpenter
Created August 26, 2009 at 6:50pm

Updated August 27, 2009 at 12:22am

U.S. Rep. Lynn Jenkins offered encouragement to conservatives at a town hall forum that the Republican Party would embrace a “great white hope” capable of thwarting the political agenda endorsed by Democrats who control Congress and President Barack Obama.

Jenkins, a Topeka Republican in her first term in Congress, shared thoughts about the GOP’s political future during an Aug. 19 forum at Fisher Community Center in the northeast Kansas community of Hiawatha.

In response to inquiries by The Topeka Capital-Journal, a Jenkins spokeswoman said Wednesday the congresswoman wanted to apologize for her word choice and to emphasize she had no intention of expressing herself in an offensive manner.

Jenkins told people at the Hiawatha forum the nation could benefit from inspired leadership of a group of “really sharp” young Republicans in the House, particularly Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va. Cantor was mentioned as a possible GOP vice presidential candidate in 2008 and is thought to be interested in seeking the Republican nomination for president in 2012.

“Republicans are struggling right now to find the great white hope,” Jenkins said to the crowd. “I suggest to any of you who are concerned about that, who are Republican, there are some great young Republican minds in Washington.”

A videotape of the presentation contains footage of Jenkins identifying three members of the U.S. House — Cantor, Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., and Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis. — as future movers and shakers in the GOP. All are white, as is Jenkins.

“So don’t, you know, lose faith if you are a conservative,” Jenkins said in Hiawatha.

Her comments were in response to a question by an audience member about the prospects of developing a coherent Republican policy blueprint — perhaps something like the Contract with America released by the GOP during the 1994 election cycle. The compact was credited with broadening support for GOP candidates and producing a Republican majority in the House.

The phrase “great white hope” is frequently tied to racist attitudes permeating the United States when heavyweight boxing champion Jack Johnson fought in the early 1900s. Reaction to the first black man to reign as champion was intense enough to build support for a campaign to find a white fighter capable of reclaiming the title from Johnson.

Kenny Johnston, executive director of the Kansas Democratic Party, said the statement by Jenkins was regrettable at the least.

“The congressman might have avoided this problem if she had stuck to discussing constructive solutions to the health care crisis instead of lamenting the Republican Party’s search for a leader,” Johnston said.

Mary Geiger, a spokeswoman for Jenkins, said the reference to a great white hope wasn’t meant to denote a preference by Jenkins for politicians of a particular “race, creed or any background.” Jenkins was expressing faith fellow GOP representatives in the House would be key players in returning Republicans to a leadership role in Washington, Geiger said.

“There may be some misunderstanding there when she talked about the great white hope,” Geiger said. “What she meant by it is they have a bright future. They’re bright lights within the party.”

Democrats widened their numerical grip on the House and Senate in the 2008 elections, which also produced a victory by Obama, the first black elected president.

Geiger released the following statement on Jenkins’ behalf: “There’s no doubt the Republican Party has gone through some dark and challenging times in recent years, but thankfully bright young leaders have stepped up to lead the party into the future and she hopes to be a part of it. That was the intent of her comments — nothing more and nothing less. Congresswoman Jenkins apologizes for her choice of words.”

Jenkins wasn’t available to comment personally on her presentation in Hiawatha, Geiger said.

Geiger said she had never previously heard Jenkins use the phrase “great white hope” in a political speech or private conversation.

Tim Carpenter can be reached

at (785) 296-3005 or

timothy.carpenter@cjonline.com.

Will Cantor denounce this sort of remark or will he tacitly

Cantor and Health Care?

August 12th, 2009

This appeared on cbsnews.com yesterday. This is the memo referred to below that Cantor sent out to Glenn Nye’s (2nd) district to intimidate Nye from voting for health care reform.

GOP, Dems Battle Over Blue Dog Districts

Posted by Stephanie Condon

Cantor and Obama (AP)

Cantor and Obama (AP)

Moderate Democrats are at the epicenter of the controversy and anger over health care reform, and both Democrats and Republicans are attempting to control the situation.

House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) has created a memo detailing the negative impacts of health care reform in each Blue Dog district. The memo was distributed in an e-mail Monday, the newspaper Roll Call reports.

For instance, the memo claims that under the House Democrats’ health care plan, hospitals in the fourth district (PDF) of Arkansas would see cuts in Medicare payments of at least $324.8 million. That district is represented by Mike Ross, chairman of the Blue Dogs’ health care task force.

In his e-mail, Cantor encouraged his whip team to explain the “impact of a government takeover on (Blue Dog) districts and constituents,” according to Roll Call.

Meanwhile, House Democrats have set up a “war room” to assist politicians put on the spot about health care at town halls, the Hill reported. The “war room,” according to the Hill, is set up in House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer’s office and staffed around the clock to give Democrats immediate answers to policy questions.

The “war room” is just one of a series of steps taken recently by Democrats to more forcefully convey their message for health care reform. The White House, for instance, recently launched a “reality check” Web site to debunk health care myths. Addtionally, President Obama’s political arm at the Democratic National Committee, Organizing for America, is asking supporters to visit their congressmen’s offices in support of health care reform.

Cantor sending memos trying to intimidate Democrats like Glenn Nye but when will Cantor have a townhall to hear the views of his constituents in the 7th district.

Remember Cantor’s “National Council for a New America?”

August 10th, 2009

This appeared in Politico this evening.

GOP rebranding effort flames out

Eric Cantor

Eric Cantor

Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.) generated the kind of buzz other politicians covet when he launched his bid to help rebrand the Republican Party last spring.

Television crews and reporters wedged themselves among the crowd of party faithful to cover the National Council for a New America’s first event at a packed pizza parlor in an Arlington, Va., strip mall. The resulting coverage dominated cable news chatter for the next week. Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney were also on board.

But the council has since flamed out – at least publicly.

Since its launch, the National Council hasn?t held a single public event, despite more than 5,000 invitations to take their show out on the road. Congressional ethics rules limit what Cantor can do with the group because he launched it from his leadership office, making it harder to organize events and recruit partners. Despite that caution, the group is still taking heat from outside watchdog groups that argue he is violating the spirit, and perhaps the letter, of those rules.

Read more: here.

“Faith and Family Alliance”

August 10th, 2009

In Mr. Cantor’s 2000 Republican primary, Tim Phillips organized a 527 group called “Faith and Family Alliance which used anti-Semitic tactics to try to defeat Cantor. Larry Sabato described this tactic as “A despicable, underground campaign that was unquestionably anti-Semitic nearly beat Cantor in the GOP primary for U.S. House to succeed Tom Bliley in June 2000.”

The same Tim Phillips is now involved with “Americans for Prosperity” which is generating pseudo “grass roots” efforts to defeat health care reform. Tim Phillips was on Rachel Maddow on MSNBC the other night: Watch the MSNBC video here on huff post.

Now Mr. Phillips claims Cantor as a friend. He says:“Eric Cantor is a good friend of mine today.”

Do you think Eric Cantor will refute Philips and others that use tactics deployed to stifle the discussion on healthcare?

Will Cantor denounce Rush’s remarks?

August 8th, 2009

Cantor has saidI’m a firm believer there is a big place for the American Jewish Community in the Republican Party,

Now,

From the Huffington Post Thursday,

Rush Limbaugh continues to put the Republican Party’s leaders in very awkward situations with his controversial, often explosive, remarks. Only a week ago Republican Rep. Eric Cantor, a leader of his party in the House, said that the GOP “needs the Rush Limbaughs” — now the conservative host is putting that statement to the test.

Today on his radio show Limbaugh compared President Obama to Hitler: “Adolf Hitler, like Barack Obama, ruled by dictate.”

Now from the Huffingtonpost yesterday,

On Friday, National Jewish Democratic Council David Harris called on House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) to denounce Limbaugh’s remarks. Pointing out that the Virginia Republican had said more “Limbaughs” were needed in the GOP just last week, Harris called on “Cantor and the Republican Party to condemn Limbaugh and these utterly contemptible tactics.”

“Mr. Cantor, after Rush’s website antics today and comments yesterday, do you really still think you ‘need’ Limbaugh?” his statement read.

The question wasn’t immediately answered, with Cantor currently traveling in Israel. But Harris’ statement got to a larger point: to what extent should the GOP — and, in particular, its Jewish members — be held accountable for the recent bout of Obama-Nazi comparisons?

How will Cantor react now?

Cantor’s Foreign Policy?

August 6th, 2009

GOP Delegation In Israel Contradicts U.S. Policy

JEN THOMAS | 08/ 6/09 05:13 AM |
JERUSALEM ? The Obama administration’s policy on Israel is misguided, puts too much emphasis on the issue of settlements and ignores the bigger threat of a nuclear-armed Iran, a U.S. delegation of Republican congressmen visiting Israel said Thursday.

Led by minority whip Eric Cantor from Virginia, the only Jewish Republican in Congress, the delegation of 25 Republicans say their weeklong mission to Israel is designed to show solidarity with the Jewish state and promote Mideast peace. A group of Democratic congressmen are expected to visit next week.

Cantor said that instead of focusing on issues such as Israeli settlement activity in the West Bank, Obama should concentrate on “the primary issue of import … and that is the existential threat that Iran poses not only to the state of Israel but to the United States.”

The congressman said he is “concerned about what the White House has been signaling of late.”

Israel believes Iran is trying to develop nuclear weapons that could one day be used against the Jewish state. Iran says its nuclear program is meant only for energy production.

Cantor and others supported Israel’s handling of the eviction of two Arab families from a house in east Jerusalem earlier this week, a move criticized by the European Union and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“I don’t think we, in America, would want another country telling us how to implement and execute our laws,” Cantor said.

The Obama administration is pressuring Israel to freeze all settlement activity on lands the Palestinians claim for a future state. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has refused to hold peace talks with Israel until such a freeze is implemented.

The congressmen have been meeting Israeli and Palestinian leaders and their tour has included visits to West Bank settlements.

Cantor says “Too much emphasis on settlements?” Really? Settlements along with security has been the big issues dividing the Palestinians and Israel. Iran is a separate issue and what does Cantor want to do about Iran, attack? This is re-fried Bush 43 saber rattling, ineffective if not outright risky. Comments Anyone?